Ode to Contraception
Warning: As the title
suggests, this blog entry is full of traditionally private personal information
about menstruation and contraception. Contraception
clearly is about pregnancy prevention, but I think it is just as much about
menstrual cycle regulation. Balancing
those needs is exceptionally important and, as an individual who has tried many
different contraception methods, I have some insight to share about it.
I started menstruating in middle school, a little more than
20 years ago, so I have had plenty of experience dealing with the radical
hormonal changes caused by the menstrual cycle.
I dealt with emotional highs and lows, uncontrolled and spontaneous
crying, shooting pains in my breasts, and frequent lower back and abdomen pain.
I had a high school friend whose menstrual cycle was so
regular that she predicted not just the day but the 15 minute window in which
her bleeding would begin each month. My
cycle was nowhere as predictable, so I continuously worried that I would start
my period during class or during work and everyone would know. (You know, standard period fears.) My cycles were also incredibly erratic in
length. I had menstrual bleeding as brief
as 3 days and as long as 21 days. Menstrual
bleeding for three weeks straight is alarming; having relief for just 7 days to
be followed by 20 more days of bleeding is a ridiculously terrible experience
and made the standard derogatory line of “it must be her time of the month!”
even more irritating.
My overwhelming desire to control my body drove me to oral
contraception. I had heard about “the
pill” -- a near mystery in my high school girl circle -- that would make my menstrual
cycle regular. I started taking ortho
tri-cyclen birth control pills freshman year of college and I rejoiced at the
changes. Adding more hormones to my body
meant I suddenly had a regular cycle – 21 days of freedom followed by 7 days of
bleeding – and Washington University’s Student Health Services provided the
medication for free. The pill was such
an incredible gift and it was my first foray into the wide world of
contraception.
However, the extra hormones also made me more emotional, so
I had more extreme highs and lows. It
also delivered a new set of problems.
The pill had to be taken at the same time each day and, with my varied
daily schedule, I did not have a standard routine for always taking it. I started setting an alarm for 5:30 a.m. – a
time I was generally always home -- so that I could take my daily pill. (My roommates were less than thrilled by my
early morning alarm, to say the least.) And
I had to ensure that I always had the next set of pills for the new month,
which is a standard adult problem but not one that I had faced much in my late
teens.
The pill was my contraceptive method of choice until I
actually needed to use it for preventative birth control. As the literature states, “less than 1 out of
100 women will get pregnant if they always take the pill as directed and about
9 out of 100 women will get pregnant if they don’t always take the pill as
directed.” I can do the math. If we’re talking even 0.5% likelihood to get
pregnant, with 50 million women, that’s suddenly 2.5 million pregnancies --
even though those women were using contraception! (The number jumps to 4.5 million pregnancies
with the 9 out of 100 number.)
Yowsa.
I had no desire for an unplanned pregnancy and my boyfriend
was anti-abortion, so I added the most effective (if used correctly) birth
control method: abstinence. When that
boyfriend became my spouse, abstinence was an even less appealing option. We added condoms as another layer of
protection (although they are not incredibly reliable) and decided that we
would become parents if a pregnancy resulted despite all these
precautions.
Time passed.
Eventually Eric and I became parents and we used the combined
breast-feeding / low dose pill / condom method to prevent another
pregnancy. Once we were certain we had
the right number of kids, Eric had a vasectomy.
In my ode to contraception, vasectomy receives a gold star. It’s nearly 100% effective, it costs about
the same as 6 months of birth control pills ($350 - $1000), and it’s an
out-patient procedure. Female
sterilization, by contrast, is incredibly expensive ($1500 - $6000) and is significantly
more invasive for the same effectiveness rating. What’s worse is that post-female
sterilization pregnancies (which do happen) have a much higher likelihood of
being ectopic – a life threatening situation for the woman. Yikes!
Once I stopped breast feeding, my menstrual cycle returned
to bleeding for 15-20 days and I was not willing to put up with that nonsense
for the next 20 years of life. In
addition, I started taking a different medication that eliminated the pill,
Depo-Provera shot, and the patch as options, because those medications release
hormones all throughout the body. I
needed a low-level hormonal option that would be targeted to my reproductive
system only. I switched to the Nuvaring,
as it was one of the few remaining choices.
The ring is inserted vaginally for three weeks and the body’s heat
activates the hormone release; after three weeks, remove the ring and have
menstrual bleeding. I mail ordered Nuvaring
in the winter and stockpiled the extras in the refrigerator; unfortunately, you
cannot mail order Nuvaring in the summer because too much heat activates the
hormones and therefore renders the ring ineffective when you actually need it.
The Nuvaring worked like a charm at regulating my menstrual
cycle and I rejoiced at the simplicity of a once-a-month method. Unfortunately, I changed insurance companies
and my $20 a month Nuvaring cost jumped to a hefty $60 a month. $720 a year was a hefty price for menstrual
cycle regularity. Consequently, I
started shopping for another option and discovered the IUD.
The IUD, or intra-uterine device, is inserted into the
uterus and it is an over 99% effective birth control method that lasts for
years. The copper IUD, which is
non-hormone based, lasts for TWELVE YEARS!
That’s just incredible. The
Mirena IUD, which is hormone based, lasts for five years, but my doctor assures
me that it actually works for seven. The
Mirena costs $500 to $1000, depending on insurance, and requires a doctor who
is trained in their insertion. My
primary care doctor was not trained, so I found another doctor to get the
Mirena IUD.
The Mirena hurts to get in position and there’s no way
around it. Jabbing something through the
vagina and cervix is a painful process but, luckily, my procedure took only
about 10 seconds. The benefits of the
Mirena cannot be overstated. The
hormones are continuously acting; there is never a point where I’m not 100%
protected against pregnancy. Additionally, I only have to
think about my birth control method once every five years, as opposed to once
every day like with the pill. And, for
menstrual cycle regulation purposes, the absolutely best side effect of the
Mirena is that 1 in 5 women stop menstruating all together. I crossed my fingers that I would fall into
that 20% category and I celebrated my good fortune when my menstrual bleeding
lightened and then eventually stopped.
I’ve been menstrual cycle free for about a year now.
Since I am no longer menstruating, I’m also no longer
experiencing the extreme emotional highs and lows that raging hormones
cause. Emotionally, I’m much more even
keeled, and that is a wondrous development.
I’m looking forward to being in this steady state until menopause. Many women balance the need for menstrual
cycle regulation with their need for effective pregnancy prevention. I am incredibly grateful that I found a
method that provides effective solutions for both problems. Thank you, Mirena!
Now, I am the lucky parent of two daughters who have
inherited my genes and quite possibly my same menstrual irregularity
problems. I am not excited about
enduring their hormonal emotional swings from the parental end, and
I feel for them because I know how challenging the whole process is to
experience.
There are so many ethical questions regarding a child using
contraception. In many cases, I don’t
want to give my daughters a choice. As
soon as menstruation begins, I want to start tapping them with the Depo shot or
(even better) connect them with the copper IUD.
But, realistically, none of these options are great for a 14 year old
girl whose parents want her to be protected well before she becomes sexually
active. Obviously, my girls will have
the choice to use whatever method they prefer and I hope that they feel
comfortable approaching me when the time is right. I recognize that they will navigate much of the
same path I did – no contraceptive choice is the right one for the entire 35 –
40 years span – but maybe they will have even better options that have not been
created yet AND they will have insurance coverage that will make those options
financially viable. I sincerely hope so.
Comments
I agree with your endorsement of vasectomies. When we decided that we were finished procreating, I had no doubt that I would be the one going under the knife and not my wife. The procedure isn't a walk in the park (I liken it to the feeling of having been kicked hard in the balls four minutes ago... for four days), but it is sooo much easier than the female equivalent.
I am curious about Eric being anti-abortion. Has that caused conflict with your strong pro-choice activism? Or is his perspective that he is personally anti-abortion but doesn't claim the right to make that decision for other people?
Thanks
Eric definitely was anti-abortion when we were in college, and that did cause conflicts then. We weren't sexually active: I wasn't willing to be a parent and I'm reasonably confident our relationship would have ended if I had an abortion. Risking our relationship wasn't worth it. Anti-abortion is not exactly his stance now. In his words, "I understand the need for it and I see it as highly practical."